The opening of the electricity market
Insist on centralism and protection of ICE is not good policy
We must be open to competition, decentralization and regional market
December 27th,2014
A few days ago, the executive and the ICE reported that they drive the Contingency Bill Power, which has as one of its up 15-30 percent of national generation by the private sector purposes. Instead they proposed no other initiative. Their strategy seems to be, simply, tranquility, arguing that domestic demand through 2019 will be covered by plants in operation or contracted.
Days ago, the Government had also ruled out even discuss formulas to enable geothermal wealth that lies in the basement of some national parks can be exploited with respect for the environment.
Both decisions, inconvenience and myopic in themselves, contradict the announced disposal of the executive to thoroughly discuss options for ensuring long-term supply of electricity, creating conditions for lower prices, expand the sources, to further encourage clean energy and adapt our electricity market to changing national and regional conditions. Instead, reflect a mixture of ideological prejudices and defense of bureaucratic-institutional constituted schemes, resulting in a centralist conception of power generation counter to international best practices and best use of public resources, and lead to put the interests of an entity-the Costa Rican Electricity- over the country in general.
Incidentally, both decisions have been emptied of relevance so-called "forum for dialogue on energy issues" coordinated by the Ministry of Environment and Energy, and raised as a multi-instance, in order to discuss the best options and explore the best solutions to address our challenges and opportunities in the field.
The assertion that domestic demand will be covered over the next four years is, to say the least risky. First, it is possible that the electricity needs increase, if the economy grows more vigorously, or if transportation that used to replace fossil fuels are introduced. Secondly, there is no guarantee that the estimated supply materialize, the projects will be developed as planned (which rarely happens) or meteorological events unexpectedly not affect the ability of dams. Worse, refer only to Costa Rica as the scope of our electricity market, and leave out any consideration the regional space that was created with the interconnection of the Isthmus, is to ignore a new reality, both supply and demand, which could offer great opportunities.
Such a parochial view, in a market that tend to expand geographically increasingly contradicts a recent initiative of ICE, aimed, according to their spokesmen, to sell services to structure and build mega power generation in Central America and the Caribbean. The ICE is not a construction company. It is much more consistent with its focus on being efficient, produce cheaper energy and compete with it in the expanded market mission.
Keep the ceiling of 15% for the private sector will involve further reduce the chances of achieving the goal of becoming un-neutral carbon in the 2021 country and further reduce the incentives or pressures on the ICE to reduce the cost burden unnecessary. Indeed, the announcement of the sale of outsourcing involves recognizing the existence of idle staff, which adds to the economic weight of the entity and, therefore, press to increase the rates.
Far from maintaining a pernicious attachment to outdated models, to protect an entity rather than national interests, and centralism bet instead of diversification, what our country needs, urgently, is another matter. We refer to a transformation of its electricity market to be re really competitive and efficient, offer equal terms to all participants and is able not only to meet the current and future demand, but also to become a generator of foreign exchange through its extension beyond our borders.
Source: "La Nación" |